Skip to main content
University of California Press

About the Book

Today, all but one U.S. jurisdiction restricts a convicted felon’s eligibility for jury service. Are there valid, legal reasons for banishing millions of Americans from the jury process? How do felon-juror exclusion statutes impact convicted felons, jury systems, and jurisdictions that impose them? Twenty Million Angry Men provides the first full account of this pervasive yet invisible form of civic marginalization. Drawing on extensive research, James M. Binnall challenges the professed rationales for felon-juror exclusion and highlights the benefits of inclusion as they relate to criminal desistance at the individual and community levels. Ultimately, this forward-looking book argues that when it comes to serving as a juror, a history of involvement in the criminal justice system is an asset, not a liability.
 

About the Author

James M. Binnall is an attorney and Associate Professor of Law, Criminology, and Criminal Justice at California State University, Long Beach.

From Our Blog

Truly Diverse Juries Must Include Citizens with Prior Criminal Convictions

By James Binnall, author of Twenty Million Angry Men: The Case for Including Convicted Felons in Our Jury SystemIn 1999, when I was twenty-three years old, I caused a DUI wreck that claimed the life of my close friend. For that tragic decision, I ultimately spent 4 years, 1 month, and 6 days in
Read More

Hear from UCP Authors at ASC 2021

UCP has a strong program in Criminology and Criminal Justice, with several of our authors are participating in the American Society of Criminology's 2021 Author Meets Critics sessions. Hear from our authors, check-out the latest titles from our criminology list, and connect with our Criminology edit
Read More

#AALS2021: Editor Maura Roessner Shares Virtual Conference Highlights

As we gear up for an online AALS, I’m reminded that last year’s meeting may have been the last “normal” conference gathering for many of us. Was it really one year ago that we all sat together in DC and watched, breathless, Vicki Jackson and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in conversation on the main st
Read More

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction 
1 • Framing the Issue
2 • Rotten to the Core?
3 • Honor Among Thieves
4 • Sequestering the Convicted: Part I
5 • Sequestering the Convicted: Part II
6 • Criminal-Desistance Summoned
7 • A Community Change Agent
8 • A Healthy Ambivalence
Conclusion 

Epilogue
Appendix A 
Appendix B
Appendix C
Notes 
References
Index

Reviews

"Not only is Twenty Million Angry Men, a quick read, but it is well written. The book reviews and contextualizes the most important scholarship that has been done on the subject of felon juror exclusion. . . . Much like the field of convict criminology, felon-juror research demonstrates how previously convicted people can make a positive contribution to understanding the subtleties of the criminal justice process that lay people often overlook."
British Journal of Criminology
"Scholars and activists need look no further than Binnall’s book for a powerful exposition of the flaws in felon-juror exclusions and compelling evidence that allowing felon-jurors to serve would enhance 'our purest form of civic engagement.'"
Law & Society Review

Twenty Million Angry Men: The Case for Including Convicted Felons in Our Jury System is a powerful title, and gives a useful preview of some of the emphases of this important book. James Binnall demonstrates the broad scope of this form of jury exclusion, unearths fascinating new material about the emotions of those involved, presents a multi-tiered argument for change, and shows, through his upfront ownership of the word ‘felon,’ that he is not going to shy away from exposing and tackling stigmatizing labels in this area of the law.”

Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books
"This book will interest students and scholars of American jurisprudence, sociology of law, and desistance studies."
CHOICE
"Well organized and…tightly argued."
Critical Criminology
"Despite the tragic decline of jury trials in the past decades, serving on a jury remains the ordinary citizen’s most intimate connection to the system of justice, imbuing the process with popular legitimacy. In this invaluable new work, James Binnall makes a highly persuasive case that the exclusion of 'people with convictions' from this vital process is needlessly punitive, robbing the justice system of a huge number of potential resources and undermining the rehabilitative process."—Shadd Maruna, Professor of Criminology, Queen’s University Belfast

"An ex-felon juror? Attorney and social scientist (and ex-felon) James Binnall provides an elegantly written, carefully balanced, and stunningly persuasive analysis, making the case for the ex-felon juror. Using experimental and survey evidence, he shows how this large group of ex-felon citizens can contribute in the jury box and to the justice system."—Shari Seidman Diamond, Northwestern University and the American Bar Foundation

“Plea deals may dominate the docket, but the jury trial still holds center stage in the American criminal-justice ritual. With careful legal analysis, clever and rigorous experiments, and the courage to tell his own story, James Binnall makes the case against the blanket exclusion of people with conviction records from jury eligibility.  A fascinating read and a vital addition to the literature on American collateral sanctions.”—Alec Ewald, editor of Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective

"In an age of mass incarceration, Binnall addresses a timely and critical question: Should convicted felons serve as jurors? In this carefully researched and well-reasoned book, Binnall makes a strong case for ending the common practice of excluding convicted felons from jury service. This is groundbreaking work!"—Nancy S. Marder, Professor of Law, Chicago-Kent College of Law

"Binnall’s creative studies show that felon-jurors can teach others and improve deliberations—precisely the accomplishment of this wonderful book. Binnall offers incredibly readable accounts of the history of jury participation and theories of recidivism, character, and democracy. His rigorous data show, once again, that all people are far more than their worst mistakes."—Mary R. Rose, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin